Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Research and Development Department, School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Ariel University, Kiryat Hamada, Israel.
This paper introduces a regression study on the operating parameters of different types of fuel cells (FCs) such as fuel used, catalysts, efficiency, operating temperature, switching time, load carriers, applications with advantages. In addition, mathematical modeling of the Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is considered for MATLAB simulation and the inter-relationships of the parametric effect schemes are discussed. In the current study, the significant operational parameters such as operating temperature, reactant (H2 and O2) flow pressure, and membrane resistance are considered. The procured results in the form of I-V or polarization curve, efficiency, power and current density have been utilized owing to study the PEMFC behavior. For the validation, designed a single MATLAB/Simulink model of PEMFC is compared with commercial existing model. The results reflect the fine coordination between the simulated and commercially available PEMFC model. Present study can be used as a supportive tool to beginners to select the appropriate parameters for a FC assisted applications.
Keywords- Current density, Fuel cell, Power density, Parametric effect, Polarization curve, Renewable energy.
Pachauri, R., Sharma, A., & Rajput, S. (2020). Parametric Effects on Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance: An Analytical Perspective. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 5(5), 926-938. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.5.071.
Conflict of Interest
The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest to declare for this publication.
The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the editor and anonymous reviews for their time and valuable suggestions.
Benchouia, N., Hadjadj, A. E., Derghal, A., Khochemane, L., & Mahmah, B. (2013). Modeling and validation of fuel cell PEMFC. Revue des Energies Renouvelables, 16(2), 365-377.
Bo, C., Yuan, C., Zhao, X., Wu, C.B., & Li, M.Q. (2009). Parametric analysis of solid oxide fuel cell. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 11(4), 391-399.
Chaudhary, S., & Chauhan, Y.K. (2014, August). Studies and performance investigations on fuel cells. In 2014 International Conference on Advances in Engineering & Technology Research (ICAETR-2014) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Unnao, India.
Coppo, M., Siegel, N.P., & Von Spakovsky, M.R. (2006). On the influence of temperature on PEM fuel cell operation. Journal of Power Sources, 159(1), 560-569.
Giddey, S., Badwal, S.P.S., Kulkarni, A., & Munnings, C. (2012). A comprehensive review of direct carbon fuel cell technology. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 38(3), 360-399.
Hermida-Castro, M.J., Hermida-Castro, D., Martínez, X.M.V., & Orosa, J.A. (2013). Comparative study of fuel cell applications and future plant conservation applications. International Journal of Energy Science, 3(5), 357-361.
Kacprzak, A., Kobylecki, R., & Bis, Z. (2013). The effects of operating conditions on the performance of a direct carbon fuel cell. Archives of Thermodynamics, 34(4), 187-197.
Kaytakoğlu, S., & Akyalçın, L. (2007). Optimization of parametric performance of a PEMFC. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(17), 4418-4423.
Kirubakaran, A., Jain, S., & Nema, R.K. (2009). A review on fuel cell technologies and power electronic interface. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2430-2440.
Mekhilef, S., Saidur, R., & Safari, A. (2012). Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 981-989.
Min, C.H., He, Y.L., Liu, X.L., Yin, B.H., Jiang, W., & Tao, W.Q. (2006). Parameter sensitivity examination and discussion of PEM fuel cell simulation model validation: part II: results of sensitivity analysis and validation of the model. Journal of Power Sources, 160(1), 374-385.
Pachauri, R.K., & Chauhan, Y.K. (2015). A study, analysis and power management schemes for fuel cells. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 1301-1319.
Pachauri, R.K., & Chauhan, Y.K. (2017). Study and performances analysis of fuel cell assisted vector control variable speed drive system used for electric vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 36(2), 167-191.
Peighambardoust, S.J., Rowshanzamir, S., & Amjadi, M. (2010). Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(17), 9349-9384.
Qingshan, X., Nianchun, W., Ichiyanagi, K., & Yukita, K. (2008, April). PEM fuel cell modeling and parameter influences of performance evaluation. In 2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (pp. 2827-2832). IEEE. Nanjing, China.
Seyezhai, R., & Mathur, B.L. (2011). Mathematical modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Computer Applications, 20(5), 1-6.
Sharaf, O.Z., & Orhan, M.F. (2014). An overview of fuel cell technology: fundamentals and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 810-853.
Stambouli, A.B., & Traversa, E. (2002). Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6(5), 433-455.
Ural, Z., Gencoglu, M.T., & Gumus, B. (2007). Dynamic simulation of a PEM fuel cell system. In Proceedings 2nd International Hydrogen Energy Congress and Exhibition IHEC. Istanbul, Turkey.
Wee, J.H. (2007). Applications of proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(8), 1720-1738.
Yuan, Z., & Yang, J. (2015). The effect of temperature on the output characteristics of micro direct methanol fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 285, 318-324.